Folke,
While I am really disappointed in the performance of DoIt, just wanted to thank you for all the help, which even if I don't end up staying with this program (given the app is crashing faster than a Jenga tower on me over and over again), is definitely giving me great input to revise my system, wherever I land or if I stay with Nirvana.
You're a great resource, because you use the GTD framework but also understand it doesn't have to be followed to the letter. I really appreciate it!
Rob
Rob, I am glad if you think I have been able to help :-)
As for Doit vs Nirvana, for me the main things about Doit is:
- colored, sortable priorities
- the extra hierarchical level above projects (called Goals, can also be seen as an "area" feature)
I don't think I would have chosen Doit if it weren't for those.
I think quite a few of the app's features are a bit half-baked and even questionable in principle, but at least the developers are moving all the time - five steps forward, four steps back, but still ... moving ... even if maybe 90% of the resulting changes is "wasted" on features that I do not care much for. Still a little trickle and a glimpse of hope.
As for Doit vs Nirvana, for me the main things about Doit is:
- colored, sortable priorities
- the extra hierarchical level above projects (called Goals, can also be seen as an "area" feature)
I don't think I would have chosen Doit if it weren't for those.
I think quite a few of the app's features are a bit half-baked and even questionable in principle, but at least the developers are moving all the time - five steps forward, four steps back, but still ... moving ... even if maybe 90% of the resulting changes is "wasted" on features that I do not care much for. Still a little trickle and a glimpse of hope.